Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Monday, October 27, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Burden of care, province of women.
A good piece of advice on any occasion, but particularly good advice for going into arguments, conferences and conventions, my friend Emily Davila told me, "Listen for what is not being said." Later, after the IAC, Emily voiced her concern that discussions about the burden of care were neglected in the conference. There was only one panel addressing the burden of care, The AIDS Care Economy and the Burden on Women, and it was scheduled at the same time as a session titled The USA HIV Epidemic in 2008. The day of the opening session of the IAC the CDC announced critical errors in the gathering of epidemiological data which resulted in the grave misrepresentation of the AIDS epidemic in the USA. In point of fact, the CDC had underreported HIV infections in the US by 40%. Needless to say, many (myself included) decided to forgo the session on the burden of care to hear what Kevin Fenton of the CDC had to say for himself (more on that later - I assure you). Although there was no way for the planners of the conference to have anticipated the overwhelming, resurgent interest in the American AIDS epidemic it was nonetheless a slight in programming for such an important matter to have only had one session devoted to it.
As I wrote in a previous post two-thirds of all caregivers for people living with AIDS in Africa are girls and women. Deeply entrenched societal views on the place and work of women, and the value of women's work product, have exacerbated the extent to which the burden of care has grown wild - unchecked, unstudied and largely ignored. Caring for ill family members, neighbors and children is work that falls largely to women because the sick room has long been believed to be the province of women. While the pervasive corrosiveness of a stereotyped view of femininity responsible for this belief is deeply problematic, an exploration of the corresponding economies of care requires a simultaneous examination of why it is that the work done in the sick room, in the service of the dying, has not been deemed work at all, but a duty that requires no remuneration.
As I wrote in a previous post two-thirds of all caregivers for people living with AIDS in Africa are girls and women. Deeply entrenched societal views on the place and work of women, and the value of women's work product, have exacerbated the extent to which the burden of care has grown wild - unchecked, unstudied and largely ignored. Caring for ill family members, neighbors and children is work that falls largely to women because the sick room has long been believed to be the province of women. While the pervasive corrosiveness of a stereotyped view of femininity responsible for this belief is deeply problematic, an exploration of the corresponding economies of care requires a simultaneous examination of why it is that the work done in the sick room, in the service of the dying, has not been deemed work at all, but a duty that requires no remuneration.
Labels:
burden of care,
economies of care,
gender inequality,
rhetoric
Monday, October 20, 2008
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)